Re: calling procedures is slow and consumes extra much memory against calling function

From: Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: calling procedures is slow and consumes extra much memory against calling function
Date: 2020-09-17 09:05:44
Message-ID: CAJ3gD9eisZ24NOWDqs-t73LSi+Xw2pMTht9+pULqNkdYe0J0hw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 17 Sep 2020 at 11:07, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 09:08:09PM +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> > I am sending another patch that tries to allow CachedPlans for CALL
> > statements. I think this patch is very accurate, but it is not nice,
> > because it is smudging very precious reference counting for CachedPlans.
>
> Amit, you are registered as a reviewer of this patch for two months
> now. Are you planning to look at it more? If you are not planning to
> do so, that's fine, but it may be better to remove your name as
> reviewer then.

Thanks Michael for reminding. I *had* actually planned to do some more
review. But I think I might end up not getting bandwidth for this one
during this month. So I have removed my name. But I have kept my name
as reviewer for bitmaps and correlation :
"https://commitfest.postgresql.org/29/2310/ since I do plan to do some
review on that one.

Thanks,
-Amit Khandekar
Huawei Technologies

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Gustafsson 2020-09-17 09:41:28 Re: Support for NSS as a libpq TLS backend
Previous Message Kyotaro Horiguchi 2020-09-17 08:59:45 Re: pgbench calculates summary numbers a wrong way.