Re: expanding inheritance in partition bound order

From: Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: expanding inheritance in partition bound order
Date: 2017-09-14 11:56:12
Message-ID: CAJ3gD9eUr5JqQBU7sfGQJstH4p83yDDNjxYv3LjDQZtnWi9cSA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 14 September 2017 at 06:43, Amit Langote
> Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> Attached updated patch.

@@ -1222,151 +1209,130 @@ PartitionDispatch *
RelationGetPartitionDispatchInfo(Relation rel,
int
*num_parted, List **leaf_part_oids)
{
+ List *pdlist;
PartitionDispatchData **pd;

+ get_partition_dispatch_recurse(rel, NULL, &pdlist, leaf_part_oids);

Above, pdlist is passed uninitialized. And then inside
get_partition_dispatch_recurse(), it is used here :
*pds = lappend(*pds, pd);

--------

pg_indent says more alignments needed. For e.g. gettext_noop() call
below needs to be aligned:
pd->tupmap = convert_tuples_by_name(RelationGetDescr(parent),
tupdesc,
gettext_noop("could not convert row type"));

--------

Other than that, the patch looks good to me. I verified that the leaf
oids are ordered exaclty in the order of the UPDATE subplans output.

--
Thanks,
-Amit Khandekar
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ashutosh Sharma 2017-09-14 11:57:27 Re: [PATCH] pageinspect function to decode infomasks
Previous Message Dmitriy Sarafannikov 2017-09-14 11:20:14 Re: Allow GiST opcalsses without compress\decompres functions