| From: | Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Declarative partitioning - another take |
| Date: | 2017-04-26 09:17:16 |
| Message-ID: | CAJ3gD9dw9jtox3m8R3ZC+Fm6x5dMhQb==b5=vmSrFi2PukzohA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 26 April 2017 at 00:28, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> So what I'd prefer -- on
> the totally unprincipled basis that it would let us improve
> performance in the future -- if you operate on a partition directly,
> you fire the partition's triggers, but if you operate on the parent,
> only the parent's triggers fire.
I would also opt for this behaviour.
Thanks,
-Amit Khandekar
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2017-04-26 10:22:36 | Re: scram and \password |
| Previous Message | Amit Langote | 2017-04-26 08:50:02 | Re: pg_dump emits ALTER TABLE ONLY partitioned_table |