From: | Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Useless code in ExecInitModifyTable |
Date: | 2018-01-19 09:50:23 |
Message-ID: | CAJ3gD9cXDrFFgv7Qwvm2ErHB+81TUh=W48VtWmcabSsE2grG9Q@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
FYI ...
For the pending update-partition-key patch, we would again require the
rel variable for UPDATE. So in the rebased update-partition-key patch
[1], 'rel' is assigned the root partitioned table. But this time, I
have used the already opened node->rootResultRelInfo to get the root
partitioned table, rather than opening it again. Details : [1] . Sorry
for not noticing this potential conflict earlier. Comments welcome.
Thanks
-Amit Khandekar
On 18 January 2018 at 12:48, Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> (2018/01/18 4:46), Tom Lane wrote:
>>
>> Pushed. I think the long delay on this is really my fault for having
>> raised an incorrect objection initially --- apologies for that.
>
>
> Thanks for committing!
>
> Best regards,
> Etsuro Fujita
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Konstantin Knizhnik | 2018-01-19 09:52:51 | Re: Built-in connection pooling |
Previous Message | Emre Hasegeli | 2018-01-19 09:38:07 | Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Improve geometric types |