Re: Best system for a data warehouse application

From: Yuri Paes Leme <yuripl(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: John Scalia <jayknowsunix(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Best system for a data warehouse application
Date: 2017-02-21 17:46:59
Message-ID: CAJ3VpNs7puHO_OOJ=QG=kB20755c22No0V9hZCF8x+8=cVJ4eQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.6/static/how-parallel-query-works.html
So, IMHO, if you can use the 9.6.x version, more cores, more power

On Tue, 21 Feb 2017 at 14:39 John Scalia <jayknowsunix(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> One of my system admins has approached me about replacing our production
> data warehouse system. I believe I know the answer, but would just like
> more opinions. He's giving me two options so far:
>
> 1) CPU = Intel e5-2637 3.5GHz 4 core with hyperthreading
>
> vs.
>
> 2) CPU = Intel e5-2650v4 2.2GHz 14 core with hyperthreading
>
> The rest of the specs are identical with 512Gb RAM and more than 2 Tb SSD
> drives. Our data warehouse is just shy of 2Tb now. I suspect the the first
> option would be more optimal as I don't think PostgreSQL can make effective
> use of a lot of processor cores. So fewer cores would be better optimized
> with the O/S. Can anyone weigh in on whether my assumptions are correct?
> --
> Jay
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John Scalia 2017-02-21 17:58:00 Re: Best system for a data warehouse application
Previous Message John Scalia 2017-02-21 17:38:22 Best system for a data warehouse application