Re: Vacuum full connection exhaustion

From: Costa Alexoglou <costa(at)dbtune(dot)com>
To: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Christophe Pettus <xof(at)thebuild(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Vacuum full connection exhaustion
Date: 2024-08-09 09:47:26
Message-ID: CAJ+5Ff4n+3SpSeDGd1UwF7JyvBkgHi7uyz0i+JtisD1m0U-PbQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Fri, Aug 9, 2024 at 1:02 AM David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> On Fri, 9 Aug 2024 at 02:12, Christophe Pettus <xof(at)thebuild(dot)com> wrote:
> > VACUUM FULL takes an exclusive lock on the table that it is operating
> on. It's possible that a connection becomes blocked on that exclusive lock
> waiting for the VACUUM FULL to finish, the application sees the connection
> stopped and fires up another one (this is common in container-based
> applications), that one blocks... until all of the connections are full of
> queries waiting on that VACUUM FULL.
>
> I also imagine this is the cause. One way to test would be to do:
> BEGIN; LOCK TABLE <name of table>; and see if the connections pile up
> in a similar way to when the VACUUM FULL command is used.
>
> David
>

Thanks folks. David really straight-forward way to test. I validated this,
when I lock the two tables involved in the benchmark the connections are
constantly growing until they reach the `max_connections`

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim Vanns 2024-08-09 10:26:49 Trouble understanding how to avoid/manage ERROR: multixact "members" limit exceeded
Previous Message 王瞿 2024-08-09 09:18:21 searching for libpq5-14.1-42PGDG.rhel8.x86_64