Re: Expression to construct a anonymous record with named columns?

From: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Benedikt Grundmann <benedikt(dot)grundmann(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alban Hertroys <haramrae(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Expression to construct a anonymous record with named columns?
Date: 2012-09-21 13:04:56
Message-ID: CAHyXU0zzmkTfEsCGchXKnKm47YMBNwLd_5u-9A3QCiLPvzRJpw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 4:18 AM, Benedikt Grundmann
<benedikt(dot)grundmann(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On 21 September 2012 07:50, Alban Hertroys <haramrae(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> On 20 Sep 2012, at 20:36, Benedikt Grundmann wrote:
>>
>> > So named anonymous records / row types seem to be strangely second
>> > class. Can somebody clarify the restrictions and rationale or even better
>> > show a way to do the equivalent of (made up syntax ahead):
>> >
>> > select row(1 as a, 2 as b);
>>
>> select * from (values (1, 2, 3)) a (a, b, c);
>>
> Thank you very much. This is very interesting. However this again seems
> to be strangely limited, because I can neither extract a column from row
> that was constructed this way in a scalar position nor expand it:
>
> proddb_testing=# select (select x from (values (1, 2, 3)) x (a, b, c));
> ?column?
> ----------
> (1,2,3)
> (1 row)

select * from (values (1, 2, 3)) x (a, b, c);
select x.* from (values (1, 2, 3)) x (a, b, c);

:-)

merlin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Adrian Klaver 2012-09-21 14:32:35 Re: Using psql -f to load a UTF8 file
Previous Message hubert depesz lubaczewski 2012-09-21 12:50:52 Re: Why csvlog logs contexts without leading tab?