Re: init script or procedure

From: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Gauthier, Dave" <dave(dot)gauthier(at)intel(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: init script or procedure
Date: 2011-08-24 15:51:03
Message-ID: CAHyXU0znpx=S=q0aUAAVS+rO0m4GPFDp1OaVk+hv5K2Wc-OF+A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 10:06 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> [snip]
>>> . This is not task for server,
>>
>> I disagree.  Other databases have them (see
>> http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb326598.aspx), and they are
>> highly used and useful.
>
> other databases has own integrated connection pooling
>
> I am not absolutely against - but we need a integrated pool before

not to argue the point, but connection pooling is only one reason of
many why you would want a logon trigger, and integrated connection
pooling is not a prerequisite for them being implemented IMO. Login
triggers are useful any time the client code is not completely under
your control, for example when logging in with psql/pgadmin or any
time really when the actionable item is required from the servers'
point of view.

merlin

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Carlos Henrique Reimer 2011-08-24 16:18:37 Explain Analyze understanding
Previous Message Samba 2011-08-24 15:33:17 Streaming Replication: Observations, Questions and Comments