From: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | David Rees <drees76(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Cuong Hoang <climbingrose(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Reliability with RAID 10 SSD and Streaming Replication |
Date: | 2013-05-17 13:19:17 |
Message-ID: | CAHyXU0zhOiHp+=BSRDx57BMQpdre2CgaqejXcKwsMf5zb-J9EA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 8:17 AM, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 1:34 AM, David Rees <drees76(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 7:46 AM, Cuong Hoang <climbingrose(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> For our application, a few seconds of data loss is acceptable.
>>
>> If a few seconds of data loss is acceptable, I would seriously look at
>> the synchronous_commit setting and think about turning that off rather
>> than risk silent corruption with non-enterprise SSDs.
>
> That is not going to help.
whoops -- misread your post heh (you were suggesting to use classic
hard drives). yeah, that might work but it only buys you so much
particuarly if there is a lot of random activity in the heap.
merlin
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Sékine Coulibaly | 2013-05-17 14:26:00 | Re: Deleting Rows From Large Tables |
Previous Message | Merlin Moncure | 2013-05-17 13:17:52 | Re: Reliability with RAID 10 SSD and Streaming Replication |