From: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Kouhei Kaigai <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com> |
Cc: | Shigeru Hanada <shigeru(dot)hanada(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PgHacker <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jim Mlodgenski <jimmy76(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Subject: | Re: [v9.5] Custom Plan API |
Date: | 2014-10-01 15:41:24 |
Message-ID: | CAHyXU0zPfMKBzoX1UzWNde+PZpXuj+Nqu7zGfLKOQ_hbQeXY8g@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 6:55 AM, Kouhei Kaigai <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com> wrote:
> * Syntax also reflects what the command does more. New syntax to
> define custom plan provider is:
> CREATE CUSTOM PLAN PROVIDER <cpp_name>
> FOR <cpp_class> HANDLER <cpp_function>;
-1 on 'cpp' prefix. I don't see acronyms used in the syntax
documentation and cpp will make people reflexively think 'c++'. How
about <provider_name> and <provider_function>?
merlin
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2014-10-01 15:44:02 | Re: autovacuum scheduling starvation and frenzy |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2014-10-01 15:31:55 | Re: autovacuum scheduling starvation and frenzy |