From: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Adam Jelinek <ajelinek(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Chris Travers <chris(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: 9.3 Json & Array's |
Date: | 2013-09-24 20:31:18 |
Message-ID: | CAHyXU0yhKhyz92N3K_cXSHjKi=v4-O30ep+ZAwyPppvXcDtjKg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 3:14 PM, Adam Jelinek <ajelinek(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I agree with the best effort type of conversion, and only being able to
> handle JSON array's that conform to an SQL array. With that said I would
> love to collaborate with you on this, but there is one thing holding me
> back. The current company I work for (an insurance company) says it is a
> conflict of interest so I have to be careful. I can try to help out in
> other ways if possible, and I will double check with our HR.
pro tip: don't ask until you already did the work.
merlin
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2013-09-24 20:40:16 | Re: pgbench progress report improvements - split 3 |
Previous Message | Adam Jelinek | 2013-09-24 20:14:33 | Re: 9.3 Json & Array's |