From: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Gregg Jaskiewicz <gryzman(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: bytea insert difference between 8.3 and 9.x |
Date: | 2011-09-26 14:12:55 |
Message-ID: | CAHyXU0yezy8ke7Szxoa-h1drXGQNDEWWrmQBvdat8-hBMy7uDQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 8:50 AM, Gregg Jaskiewicz <gryzman(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Thanks Merin.
>
> It does, and that's probably what I'll do. Your solution isn't great
> either, because it requires extra function to be run on the postgresql
> side. Me no likeey that ;)
If you are sending a bytea as encoded text, you have to call a
decoding function on the server side no matter what -- it's implicitly
done for you some cases though. the decode() route is x-version and
guarantees hex method of transfer, not the old escaped method which is
stupid and slow.
The only way to not send encoded text is via binary switch in the
protocol...not sure if libpqxx supports this method of execution.
merlin
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | DUPREZ Cédric | 2011-09-26 14:13:26 | Problem with pg_upgrade from 9.0 to 9.1 under Ubuntu x64 |
Previous Message | Edson Carlos Ericksson Richter | 2011-09-26 14:02:32 | RES: Does postgresql 9.0.4 use index on PREFIX%SUFFIX queries? |