| From: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Pradeep <pgundala(at)avineonindia(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Naveed Shaikh <naveed(dot)shaikh(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL Database performance |
| Date: | 2016-09-07 19:37:48 |
| Message-ID: | CAHyXU0yXJkG_3xp-3-jVnXk+e-67qa0pc30KwgvdrL7sZDhAbw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 11:12 PM, Pradeep <pgundala(at)avineonindia(dot)com> wrote:
> Dear Naveed,
>
> I am using PostgreSQL 9.3 version on Windows .After changing these
> parameters, I have not seen any resource management utilization.
>
> I have observed before and after changing the parameter values ,it is not
> reflecting the memory level. Maximum utilization of RAM is 3GB only.
>
> So kindly let me ,whether it will impact the RAM utilization or not?
Postgres reserves some memory for itself and relies on the operating
system to buffer the rest. So this is not really unusual or
interesting. What would be interesting is specific examples of things
that are not running as fast as you think they should be.
merlin
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | John R Pierce | 2016-09-07 19:48:57 | Re: PostgreSQL Database performance |
| Previous Message | Adrian Klaver | 2016-09-07 19:23:47 | Re: pgAdmin 4 records limit of 2000 |