Re: JSON decoding plugin

From: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Euler Taveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com(dot)br>
Cc: Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: JSON decoding plugin
Date: 2013-12-10 15:17:59
Message-ID: CAHyXU0yUyLKxMA8J4PuApw-UYV_fvXxTsodsUSYCOPA3W68qcA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Euler Taveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com(dot)br> wrote:
> On 09-12-2013 13:12, Merlin Moncure wrote:
>> This is pretty neat. Couple minor questions:
>> *) Aren't you *en*coding data into json, not the other way around (decoding?)
>>
> Yes. The 'decoding' came from the functionality (logical decoding) and
> because the POC plugin is named 'test_decoding'. I also think that
> 'json_decoding' doesn't say much about the module purpose. I confess
> that I don't like the name but can't come up with a good name. Maybe
> 'wal2json' or 'logrep2json'? Could you suggest something?

I'm partial to wal2json actually.

merlin

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2013-12-10 16:05:02 Re: pg_archivecleanup bug
Previous Message Merlin Moncure 2013-12-10 15:15:51 Re: Compression of tables