Re: Recursive query performance issue

From: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Jamie Koceniak <jkoceniak(at)mediamath(dot)com>, "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Recursive query performance issue
Date: 2015-10-21 19:49:33
Message-ID: CAHyXU0ySTF-9GueWvFma6LQzMdR=M4VXf+FzwcT2XXRYo7cxxw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 2:45 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> 2015-10-21 21:32 GMT+02:00 Jamie Koceniak <jkoceniak(at)mediamath(dot)com>:
>>
>> adama_prod=# SHOW shared_buffers;
>>
>> shared_buffers
>>
>> ----------------
>>
>> 64GB
>
>
> can you try to increase shared buffers to 200GB and decrease effective cache
> size to 180GB? If it is possibly - I am not sure, if this setting is good
> fro production usage, but the result can be interesting for bottleneck
> identification.

we need to see a snapshot from
*) top
*) perf top

merlin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message vincent elschot 2015-10-22 14:48:14 Re: Recursive query performance issue
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2015-10-21 19:45:20 Re: Recursive query performance issue