From: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Mark Hills <Mark(dot)Hills(at)framestore(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Multiple queries in transit |
Date: | 2011-10-31 17:49:05 |
Message-ID: | CAHyXU0yPOqDfnbej+JNLBBYNaPJgduB3PGWTBTrSJu4doGgr8w@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 12:09 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
>> On 31.10.2011 17:44, Mark Hills wrote:
>>> Could libpq be reasonably modified to allow this?
>
>> I believe it's doable in theory, no-one has just gotten around to it.
>> Patches are welcome.
>
> Can't you do that today with a multi-command string submitted to
> PQsendQuery, followed by multiple calls to PQgetResult?
Multi command string queries don't support parameterization. The way
I do it is to keep an application managed stack of data (as an array
of record types) to send that is accumulated when the last stack is in
transit. Then when the last response comes in you repeat.
Of course, if you could parameterize a multi command string statement,
that might be a better way to go.
merlin
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mark Hills | 2011-10-31 17:49:45 | Re: Multiple queries in transit |
Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2011-10-31 17:45:06 | Re: Multiple queries in transit |