From: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Rafal Pietrak <rafal(at)zorro(dot)isa-geek(dot)com> |
Cc: | Craig Ringer <ringerc(at)ringerc(dot)id(dot)au>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: foreign key from array element |
Date: | 2012-09-17 19:31:40 |
Message-ID: | CAHyXU0yO8OEhObkhJY2Apuk2gF5QyZP5umR+1KxavfmAE1QYgQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 7:24 AM, Rafal Pietrak <rafal(at)zorro(dot)isa-geek(dot)com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-09-17 at 19:58 +0800, Craig Ringer wrote:
>> On 09/17/2012 04:46 PM, Rafal Pietrak wrote:
> [--------------]
>> There was some quite recent discussion on ELEMENT foreign keys on the
>> -hackers list. Try searching pgsql-hackers for ELEMENT foreign key.
>>
>> See:
>> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=775
>> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=900
>>
> Thenx.
>
> Still, I cannot find it in the v9.2 release notes. Didn't the patch make
> it to the release, or I'm just looking in wrong places
> ( http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.2/static/release-9-2.html )?
It appears to be awaiting review, so the earliest possible release to
contain would be 9.3. My entirely arbitrary (and likely incorrect!)
estimation puts at about 80% chance of making 9.3, 10% chance off some
later release, and 10% chance of rejection or getting dropped.
merlin
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ryan Kelly | 2012-09-17 19:32:00 | Re: log_destination = csvlog |
Previous Message | Dann Corbit | 2012-09-17 19:26:54 | Re: Official C++ API for postgresql? |