| From: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | stefan(at)drees(dot)name, Jon Nelson <jnelson+pgsql(at)jamponi(dot)net>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: fallocate / posix_fallocate for new WAL file creation (etc...) |
| Date: | 2013-06-11 18:36:57 |
| Message-ID: | CAHyXU0y8=njVe=oCObu4M83gEaQV4PDfQjPAXgdUZyPd-f+QLQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 12:45 PM, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 6/11/13 12:22 PM, Merlin Moncure wrote:
>
>> Personally I think this patch should go in regardless -- the concerns
>> made IMNSHO are specious.
>
> That's nice, but we have this process for validating whether features go in
> or not that relies on review instead of opinions.
Sure: I phrased that badly by 'go in' I meant 'go through the review
process', not commit out of hand.
merlin
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2013-06-11 18:40:03 | Re: JSON and unicode surrogate pairs |
| Previous Message | Atri Sharma | 2013-06-11 18:23:07 | Re: 9.4 CF1 Starts Saturday: need patches, reviewers, asst. CFM |