Re: "all" not inclusive of "replication" in pg_hba.conf

From: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Rajesh Kumar Mallah <mallah(dot)rajesh(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Postgres General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: "all" not inclusive of "replication" in pg_hba.conf
Date: 2011-09-26 16:58:56
Message-ID: CAHyXU0y5DYR5P-tqQauOvQzMzXrNs6+cchVdnwM+QGRQo__3+g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 10:07 PM, Rajesh Kumar Mallah
<mallah(dot)rajesh(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Dear List ,
>
> It is been found that the entry
>
> local   all         all                               trust
>
> does not renders below redundant in pg_hba.conf
>
> local replication   replicator01         trust

I noticed this too, and I think it should. Either way, the
documentation isn't clear on this point -- either 'all' should include
the faux replication database or it should be noted in appropriate
places that 'all' doesn't/can't do that.

merlin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alan Hodgson 2011-09-26 16:59:22 Re: : PostgreSQL Online Backup
Previous Message Eduardo Morras 2011-09-26 16:56:43 Re: looking for a faster way to do that