Re: PostgreSQL Process memory architecture

From: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Ben Zeev, Lior" <lior(dot)ben-zeev(at)hp(dot)com>
Cc: Atri Sharma <atri(dot)jiit(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL Process memory architecture
Date: 2013-06-04 13:09:48
Message-ID: CAHyXU0xdDwEpLiZVXDVguCEgac0gkwFchwyky+959G-BTRL7Rw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 12:57 AM, Ben Zeev, Lior <lior(dot)ben-zeev(at)hp(dot)com> wrote:
> No matter how I try to redesign the schema the indexes consume large amount of memory,
> About 8KB per index.

8KB per index -- is that a typo? that doesn't seem like a lot to me.

merlin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ben Zeev, Lior 2013-06-04 13:24:02 Re: PostgreSQL Process memory architecture
Previous Message Andres Freund 2013-06-04 12:46:53 Re: local_preload_libraries logspam