| From: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Mkrtchyan, Tigran" <tigran(dot)mkrtchyan(at)desy(dot)de> |
| Cc: | postgres performance list <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: postgres 9.3 vs. 9.4 |
| Date: | 2014-09-18 20:32:20 |
| Message-ID: | CAHyXU0xSJR=r4savNfMcpzxBh9ZzgMc4aZtD4DxramZiexkYSw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 4:58 AM, Mkrtchyan, Tigran
<tigran(dot)mkrtchyan(at)desy(dot)de> wrote:
>
> 9.3.5:
> 0.035940 END;
>
>
> 9.4beta2:
> 0.957854 END;
time being spent on 'END' is definitely suggesting i/o related issues.
This is making me very skeptical that postgres is the source of the
problem. I also thing synchronous_commit is not set properly on the
new instance (or possibly there is a bug or some such). Can you
verify via:
select * from pg_settings where name = 'synchronous_commit';
on both servers?
What is iowait? For pci-e SSD, these drives don't seem very fast...
merlin
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mark Kirkwood | 2014-09-18 20:56:36 | Re: postgres 9.3 vs. 9.4 |
| Previous Message | Mkrtchyan, Tigran | 2014-09-18 19:50:35 | Re: postgres 9.3 vs. 9.4 |