Re: Query completed in < 1s in PG 9.1 and ~ 700s in PG 9.2

On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 1:45 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr(dot)rosas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> Em 06-11-2012 17:24, Tom Lane escreveu:
>>> Can you put together a self-contained test case to duplicate these
>>> results? I'm prepared to believe there's some sort of planner
>>> regression involved here, but we'll never find it without a test case.
>
>> I'd love to, but I'm afraid I won't have time to do this any time soon.
>> Maybe on Sunday. I'll see if I can get a script to generate the database
>> on Sunday and hope for it to replicate the issue.
>
>> Would you mind if I coded it using Ruby? (can you run Ruby code in your
>> computer?) I mean, for filling with some sample data.
>
> No objection.

hm, wouldn't timing the time to generate a raw EXPLAIN (that is,
without ANALYZE) give a rough estimate of planning time? better to
rule it out before OP goes to the trouble...

merlin