From: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | postgres performance list <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: query with pg_trgm sometimes very slow |
Date: | 2015-09-08 21:24:24 |
Message-ID: | CAHyXU0x7UO49pr6pLk8W30DF+u8xe-EG7o8hHY8YJeHD8WhC2g@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 4:21 PM, Tomas Vondra
<tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 09/08/2015 09:15 PM, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> ...
>>>
>>> I just had the exact same problem, and indeed gin fares much better.
>>
>>
>> Also, with 9.5 we will see much better worst case performance from gin
>> via Jeff's patch:
>>
>> http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commitdiff;h=97f3014647a5bd570032abd2b809d3233003f13f
>>
>> (I had to previously abandon pg_tgrm for a previous project and go
>> with solr; had this patch been in place that would not have happened)
>
> Except that pg_tgrm-1.2 is not included in 9.5, because it was committed in
> July (i.e. long after 9.5 was branched).
oops! thinko. it shouldn't be too difficult to back patch though if
you're so inclined?
merlin
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | anil7385 | 2015-09-09 10:43:01 | VACUUM VERBOSE ANALYZE taking long time to process. |
Previous Message | Tomas Vondra | 2015-09-08 21:21:21 | Re: query with pg_trgm sometimes very slow |