Re: Postgres uses too much RAM

From: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Hans Braxmeier <hans(dot)braxmeier(at)outlook(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Postgres uses too much RAM
Date: 2017-05-08 23:12:12
Message-ID: CAHyXU0wq-hh-CWWFsA6g3c0OBLw2h3pxmwWsDe+GbGH6mhaqcA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 3:23 PM, Hans Braxmeier
<hans(dot)braxmeier(at)outlook(dot)com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> on our old server (120 GB RAM) PostgreSQL 9.4.5 was using less than 10 GB of
> ram. On our new server (same system) Postgres 9.4.11 is using up to 40 GB
> Ram. Especially each idle process is consuming 2.4 GB: postgres 30764 8.3
> 2.4 3358400 3215920 ? Ss 21:58 0:24 postgres: testuser testdb [local] idle
>
>
> Summing up PG needs currently 72.14GB (also the slab_cache was increasing
> from 20 GB to 40 GB. ). For monitoring we are using munin. Is this a bug of
> 9.4.11 or what could be wrong?

can you paste unredacted snippet from, say, 'top'? A common
measuring error is to assume that shared memory usage is specific
cumulative to each process rather than from a shared pool. It's hard
to say either way from your info above.

If you do have extremely high resident memory usage, culprits might be:
*) bona fide memory leak (although this is rare)
*) bloat in the cache context (relcache, plancache, etc), especially
if you have huge numbers of tables. workaround is to recycle
processes occasionally and/or use pgbouncer
*) 3rd party package attached to the postgres process (say, pl/java).

merlin

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Scott Marlowe 2017-05-08 23:35:38 Re: Speed differences between two servers
Previous Message Scott Marlowe 2017-05-08 23:06:05 Re: Speed differences between two servers