Re: json datatype and table bloat?

From: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Gregory Haase <haaseg(at)onefreevoice(dot)com>, John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: json datatype and table bloat?
Date: 2013-11-04 16:12:39
Message-ID: CAHyXU0wbzmOq7chc3mLF1m-2mu=CJaFW81iPbefKQp7OgzH8Sg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Gregory Haase <haaseg(at)onefreevoice(dot)com> writes:
>> The json_data column is not accounted for in pg_stats:
>
> Ah! I hadn't twigged to the fact that your bloat measurement approach
> assumed you had pg_stats entries for all the columns.
>
>> So I'm not sure if I'd actually qualify this as a "bug", but it appears
>> that there is no way to currently get stats on a json data type.
>
> ANALYZE currently punts on columns that don't have an equality operator,
> which json does not. There isn't that much in the way of stats that we
> could collect, though I suppose we could still compute average datum width
> and null fraction.
>
> I'm not sure whether there are plans to invent an equality operator for
> json.

IMNSO, this may not be a bug, but it's pretty close. All base types
should have equality operator as well as other supporting
infrastructure that the database itself depends on (in/out and
send/receive for example). This is a pretty good example of why.

merlin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Adam Jelinek 2013-11-04 16:35:10 json datatype and table bloat?
Previous Message Adrian Klaver 2013-11-04 14:57:59 Re: Re: changing port numbers so pgbouncer can read geoserver and postgres