From: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Gauthier, Dave" <dave(dot)gauthier(at)intel(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Reading PG data from MySQL stored procedure |
Date: | 2011-10-20 19:33:12 |
Message-ID: | CAHyXU0wanVHfJ8kvxO1L+Kzr1cGMORjwSfR+wcgd8RPBwwr34Q@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 2:22 PM, Gauthier, Dave <dave(dot)gauthier(at)intel(dot)com> wrote:
> Here's a real long shot, but what the heck...
>
>
>
> I have a user that's using a system that gives him a single MySQL DB handle
> to work with. He must get all his data through this handle. He wants some
> of my PG based data. Not only can't he open a new DB handle to my PG DB,
> but he cannot even run something at the system level (otherwise I'd just
> give him a "psql -P pager=off <db> -c "select foo from bar" "). So it has to
> come "through" MySQL somehow, MySQL V5.1 no less.
>
>
>
> It appears that they have some sort of external language capability for
> stored procedures in their V6. And they have something else which'll run an
> external object (UDF something or other). But what I'm throwing out there
> is a question regarding any known data interchange functionality that might
> exist between these 2 different SQL DB engines.
First question: why in the world can't you do the processing on the
client side? There are gajillion and one data transfer/ETL tools!
mysql of that has pretty much zero server side extensiblity AFAIK.
Of course, it would be quite possible from postgres to query mysql
database, but I digress...
merlin
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Gauthier, Dave | 2011-10-20 19:56:35 | Re: Reading PG data from MySQL stored procedure |
Previous Message | Ian Harding | 2011-10-20 19:32:18 | Re: Extraneous Files |