Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD

From: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>, girgen(at)freebsd(dot)org, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, ftigeot(at)wolfpond(dot)org
Subject: Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD
Date: 2014-04-22 17:54:01
Message-ID: CAHyXU0wLzAHpFkpxbx4=y+mDh6rzFcW0fYpewdEeJTZLDP9-yQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 8:06 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
>
> On 04/21/2014 08:49 PM, Stephen Frost wrote:
>>
>> * Tatsuo Ishii (ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org) wrote:
>>>
>>> I observe performance degradation with PostgreSQL 9.3 vs 9.2 on Linux
>>> as well. The hardware is HP DL980G7, 80 cores, 2TB mem, RHEL 6,
>>> pgbench is used (read only query), scale factor is 1,000 (DB size
>>> 15GB).
>>
>> Can you isolate the sysv-vs-mmap patch and see what happens with just
>> that change..?
>
>
>
> This is exactly why we need a benchfarm.
>
> I actually have a client working based on Greg Smith's pgbench tools.
>
> What we would need is a way to graph the results - that's something beyond
> my very rudimentary expertise in web programming. If anyone feels like
> collaborating I'd be glad to hear from them (The web site is programmed in
> perl + TemplateToolkit, but even that's not immutable. I'm open to using,
> say, node.js plus one of its templating engines.

Hm, you got me interested. Is the data you want to visualize stored
in a database? Got some example data? (this is pretty off topic, feel
free to contact off-list or on a new thread etc).

merlin

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Florian Weimer 2014-04-22 18:45:55 Re: RFC: Async query processing
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2014-04-22 17:29:37 Re: AXLE Plans for 9.5 and 9.6