Re: 20% performance drop on PostgreSQL 9.2 from kernel 3.5.3 to 3.6-rc5 on AMD chipsets

From: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andrea Suisani <sickpig(at)opinioni(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 20% performance drop on PostgreSQL 9.2 from kernel 3.5.3 to 3.6-rc5 on AMD chipsets
Date: 2012-09-18 13:54:36
Message-ID: CAHyXU0wJ-9EGF6xPftO1M_68xsBB7ggENx2JeM934gC-HV66bw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 2:44 AM, Andrea Suisani <sickpig(at)opinioni(dot)net> wrote:
> On 09/14/2012 10:45 AM, Daniel Farina wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 12:40 AM, Nikolay Ulyanitsky <lystor(at)gmail(dot)com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi
>>> I compiled the 3.6-rc5 kernel with the same config from 3.5.3 and got
>>> the 15-20% performance drop of PostgreSQL 9.2 on AMD chipsets (880G,
>>> 990X).
>
>
> [cut]
>
>
>>> Kernel config - http://pastebin.com/cFpg5JSJ
>>>
>>> Any ideas?
>>
>>
>> Did you tell LKML? It seems like a kind of change that could be found
>> using git bisect of Linux, albiet laboriously.
>
>
>
> just a pointer to LKML thread:
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/9/14/99

There's some interesting discussion of postgres spinlocks in the thread:

"Yes, postgress performs loads better with it's spinlocks, but due to
that, it necessarily _hates_ preemption."

merlin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrea Suisani 2012-09-18 14:25:20 Re: 20% performance drop on PostgreSQL 9.2 from kernel 3.5.3 to 3.6-rc5 on AMD chipsets
Previous Message Andrea Suisani 2012-09-18 07:44:13 Re: 20% performance drop on PostgreSQL 9.2 from kernel 3.5.3 to 3.6-rc5 on AMD chipsets