From: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andrea Suisani <sickpig(at)opinioni(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: 20% performance drop on PostgreSQL 9.2 from kernel 3.5.3 to 3.6-rc5 on AMD chipsets |
Date: | 2012-09-18 13:54:36 |
Message-ID: | CAHyXU0wJ-9EGF6xPftO1M_68xsBB7ggENx2JeM934gC-HV66bw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 2:44 AM, Andrea Suisani <sickpig(at)opinioni(dot)net> wrote:
> On 09/14/2012 10:45 AM, Daniel Farina wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 12:40 AM, Nikolay Ulyanitsky <lystor(at)gmail(dot)com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi
>>> I compiled the 3.6-rc5 kernel with the same config from 3.5.3 and got
>>> the 15-20% performance drop of PostgreSQL 9.2 on AMD chipsets (880G,
>>> 990X).
>
>
> [cut]
>
>
>>> Kernel config - http://pastebin.com/cFpg5JSJ
>>>
>>> Any ideas?
>>
>>
>> Did you tell LKML? It seems like a kind of change that could be found
>> using git bisect of Linux, albiet laboriously.
>
>
>
> just a pointer to LKML thread:
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/9/14/99
There's some interesting discussion of postgres spinlocks in the thread:
"Yes, postgress performs loads better with it's spinlocks, but due to
that, it necessarily _hates_ preemption."
merlin
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrea Suisani | 2012-09-18 14:25:20 | Re: 20% performance drop on PostgreSQL 9.2 from kernel 3.5.3 to 3.6-rc5 on AMD chipsets |
Previous Message | Andrea Suisani | 2012-09-18 07:44:13 | Re: 20% performance drop on PostgreSQL 9.2 from kernel 3.5.3 to 3.6-rc5 on AMD chipsets |