Re: New server: SSD/RAID recommendations?

From: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Wes Vaske (wvaske)" <wvaske(at)micron(dot)com>
Cc: Craig James <cjames(at)emolecules(dot)com>, "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: New server: SSD/RAID recommendations?
Date: 2015-07-07 13:12:57
Message-ID: CAHyXU0w8bKJvv_FTt43SHEQT9ruZ6Sx6VFP8Bsw+h=FEUEjKCw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 1:00 PM, Wes Vaske (wvaske) <wvaske(at)micron(dot)com>
wrote:

> Storage Review has a pretty good process and reviewed the M500DC when it
> released last year.
> http://www.storagereview.com/micron_m500dc_enterprise_ssd_review
>
>
>
> The only database-specific info we have available are for Cassandra and
> MSSQL:
>
>
> http://www.micron.com/~/media/documents/products/technical-marketing-brief/cassandra_and_m500dc_enterprise_ssd_tech_brief.pdf
>
>
> http://www.micron.com/~/media/documents/products/technical-marketing-brief/sql_server_2014_and_m500dc_raid_configuration_tech_brief.pdf
>
>
>
> (some of that info might be relevant)
>
>
>
> In terms of endurance, the M500DC is rated to 2 Drive Writes Per Day
> (DWPD) for 5-years. For comparison:
>
> Micron M500DC (20nm) – 2 DWPD
>
> Intel S3500 (20nm) – 0.3 DWPD
>
> Intel S3510 (16nm) – 0.3 DWPD
>
> Intel S3710 (20nm) – 10 DWPD
>
>
>
> They’re all great drives, the question is how write-intensive is the
> workload.
>
>
>
Intel added a new product, the 3610, that is rated for 3 DWPD. Pricing
looks to be around 1.20$/GB.

merlin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Graeme B. Bell 2015-07-07 13:25:34 Re: New server: SSD/RAID recommendations?
Previous Message Graeme B. Bell 2015-07-07 13:08:51 Re: New server: SSD/RAID recommendations?