From: | Keith <keith(at)keithf4(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Dave Johansen <davejohansen(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | John Scalia <jayknowsunix(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: database must be vacuumed with <N> transactions |
Date: | 2015-06-25 21:23:44 |
Message-ID: | CAHw75vv053WV916Soes=i+fKgzdm+iHArv8Ca=sH6o+mAFeFTg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Dave Johansen <davejohansen(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 11:38 AM, John Scalia <jayknowsunix(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
>
>> The pg_stat_activity table will show you which processes are doing what,
>> and you'll be able to see their process ID from the O/S. That might help
>> you.
>>
>
> Yes, but I need to see which process ID is doing a TON of small
> transactions which is causing the XID to increment at an unexpectedly high
> rate and so my question is "if there's a way for me to get the XID for
> every connection/query?".
>
Look at the log_line_prefix options. To get everything you're looking for
to try and identify where this is coming from look at using at a minimum: %p,
%r, %m, %x, %u, %d
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.4/static/runtime-config-logging.html#GUC-LOG-LINE-PREFIX
You'll also have to make sure log_min_duration_statement is set to low
enough to log the queries you're looking for. Beware setting disabling it
or setting it too low, though, if you have a very high number of queries
being run. This can quickly overload your IO and disk space.
If you get the database running again, you can also look at the
pg_stat_statements contrib module to log query counts and parameterized
versions of all queries being run.
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.4/static/pgstatstatements.html
And I can't let this email go without say you REALLY need to look at
upgrading your database. 8.4 is no longer being supported and receives no
security or bug fixes.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2015-06-25 22:20:21 | Re: Postgresql 9.3.9 |
Previous Message | John Scalia | 2015-06-25 18:42:47 | Re: database must be vacuumed with <N> transactions |