From: | Shubham Khanna <khannashubham1197(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rajendra Kumar Dangwal <dangwalrajendra888(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, euler(at)eulerto(dot)com |
Subject: | Re: Pgoutput not capturing the generated columns |
Date: | 2024-10-08 06:10:59 |
Message-ID: | CAHv8RjL_9wrvFUWo+nqngkiiy9Nq1d+XY-EM9aV8yT+dkUr7kg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Oct 4, 2024 at 9:43 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Hi Shubham, I don't have any new comments for the patch v36-0002.
>
> But, according to my records, there are multiple old comments not yet
> addressed for this patch. I am giving reminders for those below so
> they don't get accidentally overlooked. Please re-confirm and at the
> next posted version please respond individually to each of these to
> say if they are addressed or not.
>
> ======
>
> 1. General
> From review v31 [1] comment #1. Patches 0001 and 0002 should be merged.
>
> ======
> src/backend/replication/logical/tablesync.c
>
> make_copy_attnamelist:
>
> 2.
> From review v31 [1] comment #4. Make the detailed useful error message
> common if possible.
>
> ~~~
This comment is still open. Will fix this in next versions of patches.
>
> fetch_remote_table_info:
>
> 3.
> From review v31 [1] comment #5. I was not sure if this logic is
> sophisticated enough to handle the case when the same table has
> gencols but there are multiple subscribed publications and the
> 'publish_generated_columns' parameter differs. Is this scenario
> tested?
>
> ~
>
> 4.
> + * Get column lists for each relation, and check if any of the
> + * publications have the 'publish_generated_columns' parameter enabled.
>
> From review v32 [2] comment #1. This needs some careful testing. I was
> not sure if sufficient to just check the 'publish_generated_columns'
> flag. Now that "column lists take precedence" it is quite possible for
> all publications to say 'publish_generated_columns=false', but the
> publication can still publish gencols *anyway* if they are specified
> in a column list.
>
> ======
> [1] review v31 18/9 -
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAHv8Rj%2BKOoh58Uf5k2MN-%3DA3VdV60kCVKCh5ftqYxgkdxFSkqg%40mail.gmail.com#f2f3b48080f96ea45e1410f5b1cd9735
> [2] review v32 24/9 -
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAHut%2BPu7EcK_JTgWS7GzeStHk6Asb1dmEzCJU2TJf%2BW1Zy30LQ%40mail.gmail.com
>
I have fixed the comments and posted the v37 patches for them. Please
refer to the updated v37 Patches here in [1]. See [1] for
the changes added.
Thanks and Regards,
Shubham Khanna.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alexander Pyhalov | 2024-10-08 06:24:15 | Re: Partition-wise join with whole row vars |
Previous Message | Shubham Khanna | 2024-10-08 06:07:16 | Re: Pgoutput not capturing the generated columns |