From: | Shubham Khanna <khannashubham1197(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | David Zhang <david(dot)zhang(at)highgo(dot)ca>, Christoph Heiss <christoph(at)c8h4(dot)io>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] psql: Add tab-complete for optional view parameters |
Date: | 2023-11-28 03:42:34 |
Message-ID: | CAHv8RjK2vNG0tKwRW-XU64V69sWO9R+dWnxJ5xBurgdMQ6xnfg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 4:37 PM Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 14 Aug 2023 at 18:34, David Zhang <david(dot)zhang(at)highgo(dot)ca> wrote:
> >
> > it would be great to switch the order of the 3rd and the 4th line to make a
> > better match for "CREATE" and "CREATE OR REPLACE" .
> >
>
> I took a look at this, and I think it's probably neater to keep the
> "AS SELECT" completion for CREATE [OR REPLACE] VIEW xxx WITH (*)
> separate from the already existing support for "AS SELECT" without
> WITH.
>
> A couple of other points:
>
> 1. It looks slightly neater, and works better, to complete one word at
> a time -- e.g., "WITH" then "(", instead of "WITH (", since the latter
> doesn't work if the user has already typed "WITH".
>
> 2. It should also complete with "=" after the option, where appropriate.
>
> 3. CREATE VIEW should offer "local" and "cascaded" after
> "check_option" (though there's no point in doing likewise for the
> boolean options, since they default to true, if present, and false
> otherwise).
>
> Attached is an updated patch, incorporating those comments.
>
> Barring any further comments, I think this is ready for commit.
I reviewed the given Patch and it is working fine.
Thanks and Regards,
Shubham Khanna.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2023-11-28 03:47:03 | Re: SSL tests fail on OpenSSL v3.2.0 |
Previous Message | shveta malik | 2023-11-28 03:13:39 | Re: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby |