From: | Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Imseih (AWS), Sami" <simseih(at)amazon(dot)com>, Benoit Lobréau <benoit(dot)lobreau(at)dalibo(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Logging parallel worker draught |
Date: | 2024-02-25 22:32:52 |
Message-ID: | CAHut+PvzuskpEz74nnFAdW+yjXf_S=jGQybJkSX8pcxtHsBsXQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 6:13 AM Tomas Vondra
<tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>
> 1) name of the GUC
>
> I find the "log_parallel_worker_draught" to be rather unclear :-( Maybe
> it's just me and everyone else just immediately understands what this
> does / what will happen after it's set to "on", but I find it rather
> non-intuitive.
>
Also, I don't understand how the word "draught" (aka "draft") makes
sense here -- I assume the intended word was "drought" (???).
==========
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josef Šimánek | 2024-02-25 22:34:10 | Re: [PATCH] Add --syntax to postgres for SQL syntax checking |
Previous Message | Tomas Vondra | 2024-02-25 22:24:24 | Re: [PATCH] Add --syntax to postgres for SQL syntax checking |