Re: Logging parallel worker draught

From: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: "Imseih (AWS), Sami" <simseih(at)amazon(dot)com>, Benoit Lobréau <benoit(dot)lobreau(at)dalibo(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Logging parallel worker draught
Date: 2024-02-25 22:32:52
Message-ID: CAHut+PvzuskpEz74nnFAdW+yjXf_S=jGQybJkSX8pcxtHsBsXQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 6:13 AM Tomas Vondra
<tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>

> 1) name of the GUC
>
> I find the "log_parallel_worker_draught" to be rather unclear :-( Maybe
> it's just me and everyone else just immediately understands what this
> does / what will happen after it's set to "on", but I find it rather
> non-intuitive.
>

Also, I don't understand how the word "draught" (aka "draft") makes
sense here -- I assume the intended word was "drought" (???).

==========
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josef Šimánek 2024-02-25 22:34:10 Re: [PATCH] Add --syntax to postgres for SQL syntax checking
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2024-02-25 22:24:24 Re: [PATCH] Add --syntax to postgres for SQL syntax checking