Re: Single transaction in the tablesync worker?

From: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Single transaction in the tablesync worker?
Date: 2021-01-28 06:18:35
Message-ID: CAHut+PvzHRRA_5O0R8KZCb1tVe1mBVPxFtmttXJnmuOmAegoWA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Amit.

PSA the v21 patch for the Tablesync Solution1.

Main differences from v20:
+ Rebased to latest OSS HEAD @ 27/Jan
+ v21 is a merging of patches [v17] and [v20], which was made
necessary when it was found [ak0127] that the v20 usage of TEMPORARY
tablesync slots did not work correctly. v21 reverts to using PERMANENT
tablesync slots same as implemented in v17, while retaining other
review comment fixes made for v18, v19, v20.

----
[v17] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAHut%2BPt9%2Bg8qQR0kMC85nY-O4uDQxXboamZAYhHbvkebzC9fAQ%40mail.gmail.com
[v20] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAHut%2BPuNwSujoL_dwa%3DTtozJ_vF%3DCnJxjgQTCmNBkazd8J1m-A%40mail.gmail.com
[ak0127] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAA4eK1LDsj9kw4FbWAw3CMHyVsjafgDum03cYy-wpGmor%3D8-1w%40mail.gmail.com

Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia

Attachment Content-Type Size
v21-0002-Tablesync-extra-logging.patch application/octet-stream 6.0 KB
v21-0001-Tablesync-Solution1.patch application/octet-stream 35.1 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message k.jamison@fujitsu.com 2021-01-28 06:33:50 RE: libpq debug log
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2021-01-28 06:06:32 Re: Support for NSS as a libpq TLS backend