Re: GUC tables - use designated initializers

From: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: GUC tables - use designated initializers
Date: 2022-10-04 07:01:16
Message-ID: CAHut+Pvnha6pv==wEGZzeMJF7Cx1UhJ=DYy7WV_yhZKvZsu_ZA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Oct 4, 2022 at 5:48 PM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 04, 2022 at 04:20:36PM +1100, Peter Smith wrote:
> > The v2 patches are updated as follows:
> >
> > 0001 - Now this patch only fixes a comment that had a wrong enum name.
>
> This was wrong, so fixed.

Thanks for pushing!

>
> > 0002 - Removes unnecessary whitespace (same as v1-0002)
>
> This one does not seem worth doing, though..

Yeah, fair enough. I didn't really expect much support for that one,
but I thought I'd post it anyway when I saw it removed 250 lines from
the already long source file.

------
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2022-10-04 07:07:36 get rid of Abs()
Previous Message Amul Sul 2022-10-04 06:57:25 Re: Convert macros to static inline functions