Re: Single transaction in the tablesync worker?

From: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Single transaction in the tablesync worker?
Date: 2021-02-11 02:16:59
Message-ID: CAHut+Pva3y01QFOQbe7Ka7Mi30x-gE1FoBxeFUfab2rZyoEADw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I have reviewed again the latest patch (V31)

I found only a few minor nitpick issues not worth listing.

Then I ran the subscription TAP tests 50x in a loop as a kind of
stress test. That ran for 2.5hrs and the result was all 50x 'Result:
PASS'.

So V31 looks good to me.

------
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2021-02-11 03:10:34 Re: 64-bit XIDs in deleted nbtree pages
Previous Message Andy Fan 2021-02-11 02:05:07 Re: [PATCH] Keeps tracking the uniqueness with UniqueKey