Re: pg_upgrade and logical replication

From: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade and logical replication
Date: 2023-11-09 02:14:05
Message-ID: CAHut+PvNb3Zvoce3WmB-6ewY0ReN6aoM9X2WVwV4CRmqARnm-Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Thanks for addressing my previous review comments.

I re-checked the latest patch v12-0001 and found the following:

======
Commit message

1.
The new SQL binary_upgrade_create_sub_rel_state function has the following
syntax:
SELECT binary_upgrade_create_sub_rel_state(subname text, relid oid,
state char [,sublsn pg_lsn])

~

Looks like v12 accidentally forgot to update this to the modified
function name 'binary_upgrade_add_sub_rel_state'

======
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Melanie Plageman 2023-11-09 02:23:01 Re: Eager page freeze criteria clarification
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2023-11-09 02:05:44 Re: [PATCHES] Post-special page storage TDE support