| From: | Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PGDOCS] Inconsistent linkends to "monitoring" views. |
| Date: | 2023-10-03 09:40:52 |
| Message-ID: | CAHut+PvCD7E9Y7xF+9uyGafx0t+jDjawxYi4eq8pOQxFmS7J8A@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 6:30 PM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 03, 2023 at 01:11:15PM +1100, Peter Smith wrote:
> > I noticed one or two "monitoring" links and linkends that are slightly
> > inconsistent from all the others.
>
> - <link linkend="monitoring-pg-stat-subscription">
> + <link linkend="monitoring-pg-stat-subscription-view">
>
> Is that really worth bothering for the internal link references?
I preferred 100% consistency instead of 95% consistency. YMMV.
> This can create extra backpatching conflicts.
Couldn't the same be said for every patch that fixes a comment typo?
This is like a link typo, so what's the difference?
======
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | vignesh C | 2023-10-03 09:47:57 | Re: Improvements in pg_dump/pg_restore toc format and performances |
| Previous Message | Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) | 2023-10-03 09:40:26 | RE: [PoC] pg_upgrade: allow to upgrade publisher node |