From: | Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: src/bin/pg_upgrade/t/004_subscription.pl test comment fix |
Date: | 2024-02-04 21:12:18 |
Message-ID: | CAHut+PvAz-Dxw_vuV27LE0hC4iXhDqJuar_r2qLaMKQ8M7Bigw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Feb 3, 2024 at 5:28 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 5:58 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > OK. Now using your suggested 2nd sentence:
> >
> > +# The subscription's running status and failover option should be preserved
> > +# in the upgraded instance. So regress_sub1 should still have
> > subenabled,subfailover
> > +# set to true, while regress_sub2 should have both set to false.
> >
> > ~
> >
> > I also tweaked some other nearby comments/messages which did not
> > mention the 'failover' preservation.
> >
>
> Looks mostly good to me. One minor nitpick:
> *
> along with retaining the replication origin's remote lsn
> -# and subscription's running status.
> +# and subscription's running status and failover option.
>
> I don't think we need to use 'and' twice in the above sentence. We
> should use ',' between different properties. I can change this on
> Monday and push it unless you think otherwise.
>
+1
======
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alexander Korotkov | 2024-02-04 23:51:34 | Re: On login trigger: take three |
Previous Message | David E. Wheeler | 2024-02-04 19:20:38 | Re: to_regtype() Raises Error |