Re: src/bin/pg_upgrade/t/004_subscription.pl test comment fix

From: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: src/bin/pg_upgrade/t/004_subscription.pl test comment fix
Date: 2024-02-04 21:12:18
Message-ID: CAHut+PvAz-Dxw_vuV27LE0hC4iXhDqJuar_r2qLaMKQ8M7Bigw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Feb 3, 2024 at 5:28 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 5:58 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > OK. Now using your suggested 2nd sentence:
> >
> > +# The subscription's running status and failover option should be preserved
> > +# in the upgraded instance. So regress_sub1 should still have
> > subenabled,subfailover
> > +# set to true, while regress_sub2 should have both set to false.
> >
> > ~
> >
> > I also tweaked some other nearby comments/messages which did not
> > mention the 'failover' preservation.
> >
>
> Looks mostly good to me. One minor nitpick:
> *
> along with retaining the replication origin's remote lsn
> -# and subscription's running status.
> +# and subscription's running status and failover option.
>
> I don't think we need to use 'and' twice in the above sentence. We
> should use ',' between different properties. I can change this on
> Monday and push it unless you think otherwise.
>

+1

======
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexander Korotkov 2024-02-04 23:51:34 Re: On login trigger: take three
Previous Message David E. Wheeler 2024-02-04 19:20:38 Re: to_regtype() Raises Error