Re: Pgoutput not capturing the generated columns

From: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, "Shinoda, Noriyoshi (SXD Japan FSIP)" <noriyoshi(dot)shinoda(at)hpe(dot)com>, Shubham Khanna <khannashubham1197(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rajendra Kumar Dangwal <dangwalrajendra888(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, "euler(at)eulerto(dot)com" <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Pgoutput not capturing the generated columns
Date: 2025-01-20 05:32:07
Message-ID: CAHut+Pv9X9LjTJt0wU+ySbZU-sXCO_bFmEGxinROkA48f8Ws+w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Vignesh,

Thanks for including my patch in your patch set, ensuring that it does
not get left behind.

1.
These docs are mostly still OK, but have become slightly stale because:

a) they should mention "stored" in some places

b) the examples now need to be using the new enum form of the
publication option introduced in your patch 0003

~~~

2.
Fixed a typo /explicty/explicitly/

======

I've attached a top-up patch to "fix" all issues I found for the
v53-0005 docs patch. Please have a look and apply them if they seem OK
to you.

======
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia

Attachment Content-Type Size
PS_GENCOLS_v530005_DIFFS.txt text/plain 3.5 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2025-01-20 05:33:23 Re: connection establishment versus parallel workers
Previous Message Yura Sokolov 2025-01-20 05:12:30 Re: int64 support in List API