From: | Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | walsender.c fileheader comment |
Date: | 2024-06-11 02:35:42 |
Message-ID: | CAHut+PusveZf5pfKTYzjioZ=Lx4TJFKRXs0KhTQjNueKQwkABg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
I was reading the walsender.c fileheader comment while studying
another thread. I think if there is logical replication in progress
then the PROCSIG_WALSND_INIT_STOPPING handler will *always* switch to
a "stopping" state: e.g.,
/*
* Handle PROCSIG_WALSND_INIT_STOPPING signal.
*/
void
HandleWalSndInitStopping(void)
{
Assert(am_walsender);
/*
* If replication has not yet started, die like with SIGTERM. If
* replication is active, only set a flag and wake up the main loop. It
* will send any outstanding WAL, wait for it to be replicated to the
* standby, and then exit gracefully.
*/
if (!replication_active)
kill(MyProcPid, SIGTERM);
else
got_STOPPING = true;
}
~~~
But the walsender.c fileheader comment seems to be saying something
slightly different. IIUC, some minor rewording of the comment is
needed so it describes the code better.
HEAD
...
* shutdown, if logical replication is in progress all existing WAL records
* are processed followed by a shutdown. Otherwise this causes the walsender
* to switch to the "stopping" state. In this state, the walsender will reject
* any further replication commands. The checkpointer begins the shutdown
...
SUGGESTION
.. shutdown. If logical replication is in progress, the walsender
switches to a "stopping" state. In this state, the walsender will
reject any further replication commands - but all existing WAL records
are processed - followed by a shutdown.
~~~
I attached a patch for the above-suggested change.
Thoughts?
======
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v1-0001-walsender-fileheader-comment.patch | application/octet-stream | 2.0 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Noah Misch | 2024-06-11 02:45:25 | Re: race condition in pg_class |
Previous Message | Nathan Bossart | 2024-06-11 02:25:10 | Re: Allow logical failover slots to wait on synchronous replication |