Re: Perform streaming logical transactions by background workers and parallel apply

On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 5:22 PM Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 2:20 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 8:17 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Summary
> > > -------
> > >
> > > In summary, everything I have tested so far appeared to be working
> > > properly. In other words, for overlapping streamed transactions of
> > > different kinds, and regardless of whether zero/some/all of those
> > > transactions are getting processed by a PA worker, the resulting
> > > replicated data looked consistently OK.
> > >
> >
> > Thanks for doing the detailed testing of this patch. I think the one
> > area where we can focus more is the switch-to-serialization mode while
> > sending changes to the parallel worker.
> >
> > >
> > > NOTE - all testing described in this post above was using v58-0001
> > > only. However, the point of implementing these as a .spec test was to
> > > be able to repeat these same regression tests on newer versions with
> > > minimal manual steps required. Later I plan to fetch/apply the most
> > > recent patch version and repeat these same tests.
> > >
> >
> > That would be really helpful.
> >
>

FYI, my pub-sub.spec tests gave the same result (i.e. pass) when
re-run with the latest v63 (0001,0002,0003) applied.

------
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia