| From: | Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com>, Greg Nancarrow <gregn4422(at)gmail(dot)com>, "houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, "tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Önder Kalacı <onderkalaci(at)gmail(dot)com>, japin <japinli(at)hotmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: row filtering for logical replication |
| Date: | 2021-12-07 06:35:38 |
| Message-ID: | CAHut+PugCTDwoS6Ysaocj+AjqSUuxB5qL6F=7_E2v59E9MZm7A@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Euler –
As you know we have been posting patch update versions to the
Row-Filter thread several times a week now for a few months. We are
carefully tracking all open review comments of the thread and fixing
as many as possible with each version posted.
~~
It is true that the multiple patches are difficult to maintain
(particular for test cases impacting other patches), but
- this is the arrangement that Amit preferred (without whose support
as a committer this patch would likely be stalled).
- separate patches have allowed us to spread the work across multiple
people to improve the velocity (e.g. the Hou-san top-up patch 0005).
- having multiple patches also allows the review comments to be more focused.
~~
We were mid-way putting together the next v45* when your latest
attachment was posted over the weekend. So we will proceed with our
original plan to post our v45* (tomorrow).
After v45* is posted we will pause to find what are all the
differences between your unified patch and our v45* patch set. Our
intention is to integrate as many improvements as possible from your
changes into the v46* etc that will follow tomorrow’s v45*. On some
points, we will most likely need further discussion.
With luck, soon everything can be more in sync again.
------
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Noah Misch | 2021-12-07 06:39:04 | Re: Do we need pre-allocate WAL files during end-of-recovery checkpoint? |
| Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2021-12-07 06:20:26 | Re: pg_get_publication_tables() output duplicate relid |