Re: locking [user] catalog tables vs 2pc vs logical rep

From: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Markus Wanner <markus(dot)wanner(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Subject: Re: locking [user] catalog tables vs 2pc vs logical rep
Date: 2021-06-01 07:32:33
Message-ID: CAHut+PuTjTp_WERO=3Ybp8snTgDpiZeNaxzZhN8ky8XMo4KFVQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi.

The attached PG docs patch about catalog deadlocks was previously
implemented in another thread [1], but it seems more relevant to this
one.

PSA.

------
[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAA4eK1K%2BSeT31pxwL5iTvXq%3DJhZpG_cUJLFhiz-eD%2BJr-WAPeg%40mail.gmail.com

Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia.

Attachment Content-Type Size
pg_docs_deadlock_note.diff application/octet-stream 897 bytes

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2021-06-01 07:34:44 Re: Multiple hosts in connection string failed to failover in non-hot standby mode
Previous Message Joel Jacobson 2021-06-01 06:59:23 Re: security_definer_search_path GUC