Re: add log messages when replication slots become active and inactive (was Re: Is it worth adding ReplicationSlot active_pid to ReplicationSlotPersistentData?)

From: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: add log messages when replication slots become active and inactive (was Re: Is it worth adding ReplicationSlot active_pid to ReplicationSlotPersistentData?)
Date: 2023-03-23 09:21:47
Message-ID: CAHut+Pu6Knwooc_NckMxszGrAJnytgpMadtoJ-OA-SFWT+GFYw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi, I had a quick look at the v7 patch.

You might consider to encapsulate some of this logic in new functions like:

void
LogReplicationSlotAquired(bool is_physical, char *slotname)
{
loglevel = log_replication_commands ? LOG : DEBUG3;

if (is_physical)
ereport(loglevel,
(errmsg("acquired physical replication slot \"%s\"", slotname)));
else
ereport(loglevel,
(errmsg("acquired logical replication slot \"%s\"", slotname)));
}

void
LogReplicationSlotReleased(bool is_physical, char *slotname)
{
loglevel = log_replication_commands ? LOG : DEBUG3;

if (is_physical)
ereport(loglevel,
(errmsg("released physical replication slot \"%s\"", slotname)));
else
ereport(loglevel,
(errmsg("released logical replication slot \"%s\"", slotname)));
}

~~

THEN

ReplicationSlotShmemExit and WalSndErrorCleanup can call it like:
if (MyReplicationSlot != NULL)
{
bool is_physical = SlotIsPhysical(MyReplicationSlot);
char *slotname = pstrdup(NameStr(MyReplicationSlot->data.name));

ReplicationSlotRelease();
LogReplicationSlotReleased(is_physical, slotname);
}

~

StartlReplication can call like:
LogReplicationSlotAquired(true, cmd->slotname);
...
LogReplicationSlotReleased(true, cmd->slotname);

~

StartLogicalReplication can call like:
LogReplicationSlotAquired(false, cmd->slotname);
...
LogReplicationSlotReleased(false, cmd->slotname);

~~~

TBH, I am not sure for the *current* code if the encapsulation is
worth the trouble or not. But maybe at least it helps message
consistency and will make it easier if future callers are needed. I
guess those functions could also give you some central point to
comment the intent of this logging? Feel free to take or leave this
code suggestion.

------
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2023-03-23 09:35:55 Re: doc: add missing "id" attributes to extension packaging page
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2023-03-23 09:21:21 Re: [BUG] pg_stat_statements and extended query protocol