Re: Refactor to use common function 'get_publications_str'.

From: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Refactor to use common function 'get_publications_str'.
Date: 2024-10-24 06:44:44
Message-ID: CAHut+Pu3g8UAmnp2iEUEeceovYvhLrYujJbXr=6dmfJoJc1TnQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 5:41 PM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 05:27:25PM +1100, Peter Smith wrote:
> > Yes, well spotted -- I was aware of that. Originally I had coded a >=
> > PG15 check for that pub_names assignment. e.g.
> >
> > if (walrcv_server_version(LogRepWorkerWalRcvConn) >= 150000)
> > GetPublicationsStr(MySubscription->publications, pub_names, true);
>
> I was wondering about putting the call of GetPublicationsStr() in the
> first block with the makeStringInfo(), have an Assert checking that
> pub_names->data is never NULL in the second block, and destroy the
> StringInfo only if it has been allocated.
>
> > But, somehow it seemed messy to do that just to cater for something I
> > thought was not particularly likely. OTOH, I am happy to put that
> > check back in if you think it is warranted.
>
> I think I would add it. The publication list is not mandatory, but
> your patch makes it look so.
> --

No problem. I will post an updated patch tomorrow.

======
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message vignesh C 2024-10-24 06:45:46 Re: Pgoutput not capturing the generated columns
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2024-10-24 06:43:26 Re: [BUG FIX] Fix validation of COPY options FORCE_NOT_NULL/FORCE_NULL