Re: Question about behavior of deletes with REPLICA IDENTITY NOTHING

From: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: James Coleman <jtc331(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Question about behavior of deletes with REPLICA IDENTITY NOTHING
Date: 2024-12-16 23:16:47
Message-ID: CAHut+PtzT4D8MfCZ9y52zOCN7pHJD4AYYjNyH3e7B2bGkU+2MQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

While revisiting some old threads, I found this one that seemed to
reach a conclusion, but then it seemed nothing happened.

After multiple suggestions AFAICT James preferred the docs [1]
modification suggested [2] by Laurenz.

Should we make a CF entry for this with the status RfC, or was the
whole thing abandoned for some reason?

======
[1] https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/logical-replication-publication.html
[2] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAAaqYe91iO3dfUnVmBs4M-4aUX_zHmPN72ELE7c_8qAO_toPmA%40mail.gmail.com

Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2024-12-16 23:23:45 Re: FileFallocate misbehaving on XFS
Previous Message Noah Misch 2024-12-16 23:16:18 Re: Windows UTF8 system locale