Re: Adding a LogicalRepWorker type field

From: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Adding a LogicalRepWorker type field
Date: 2023-08-14 06:38:29
Message-ID: CAHut+PtTw17KsNU5TziWa1p1ZCg6vjkcE9u1u5KySH9=ubY5dg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

The main patch for adding the worker type enum has been pushed [1].

Here is the remaining (rebased) patch for changing some previous
cascading if/else to switch on the LogicalRepWorkerType enum instead.

PSA v8.

------
[1] https://github.com/postgres/postgres/commit/2a8b40e3681921943a2989fd4ec6cdbf8766566c

Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia

Attachment Content-Type Size
v8-0001-Switch-on-worker-type.patch application/octet-stream 6.7 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ashutosh Bapat 2023-08-14 07:03:35 Re: Report planning memory in EXPLAIN ANALYZE
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2023-08-14 06:28:41 Re: Support to define custom wait events for extensions