From: | Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, "kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Handle infinite recursion in logical replication setup |
Date: | 2022-05-02 00:18:59 |
Message-ID: | CAHut+PtAOa5eBc2cXaJktuKRb6Z3iuUuqEhBYRwYx0wsmoOFrw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Thanks for updating the patches for all my prior feedback.
For v12* I have only minor feedback for the docs.
======
V12-0001
no comments
======
V12-0002
1. Commit message
In another thread using the terminology "multi-master" seems to be
causing some problems. Maybe you should choose different wording in
this commit message to avoid having the same problems?
~~~
2. doc/src/sgml/logical-replication.sgml
These are all similar minor wording suggestions to split the sentences.
Wording: ", here copy_data is specified as XXX ..." -> ". Use
copy_data specified as XXX ..."
Also:
Wording: "... to subscribe the changes from nodeXXX..."
-> "... to subscribe to the changes from nodeXXX... " (add "to")
-> "... to subscribe to nodeXXX." (or I preferred just remove the
whole "changes" part)
2a.
Create a subscription in node3 to subscribe the changes from node1,
here copy_data is specified as force so that the existing table data
is copied during initial sync:
SUGGESTION
Create a subscription in node3 to subscribe to node1. Use copy_data
specified as force so that the existing table data is copied during
initial sync:
2b.
Create a subscription in node1 to subscribe the changes fromnode3,
here copy_data is specified as force so that the existing table data
is copied during initial sync:
SUGGESTION
Create a subscription in node1 to subscribe to node3. Use copy_data
specified as force so that the existing table data is copied during
initial sync:
2c.
Create a subscription in node2 to subscribe the changes from node3,
here copy_data is specified as force so that the existing table data
is copied during initial sync:
SUGGESTION
Create a subscription in node2 to subscribe to node3. Use copy_data
specified as force so that the existing table data is copied during
initial sync:
2d.
Create a subscription in node3 to subscribe the changes from node1,
here copy_data is specified as force when creating a subscription to
node1 so that the existing table data is copied during initial sync:
SUGGESTION
Create a subscription in node3 to subscribe to node1. Use copy_data
specified as force when creating a subscription to node1 so that the
existing table data is copied during initial sync:
2e.
Create a subscription in node3 to subscribe the changes from node2,
here copy_data is specified as off as the initial table data would
have been copied in the earlier step:
SUGGESTION (this one has a bit more re-wording than the others)
Create a subscription in node3 to subscribe to node2. Use copy_data
specified as off because the initial table data would have been
already copied in the previous step:
~~~
3. doc/src/sgml/logical-replication.sgml
31.11.2. Adding new node when there is no data in any of the nodes
31.11.3. Adding new node when data is present in the existing nodes
31.11.4. Adding new node when data is present in the new node
Minor change to the above heading?
Wording: "Adding new node ..." -> "Adding a new node ..."
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2022-05-02 02:03:13 | Re: Logical replication timeout problem |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2022-05-02 00:02:45 | Re: Tree-walker callbacks vs -Wdeprecated-non-prototype |