Re: Functions 'is_publishable_class' and 'is_publishable_relation' should stay together.

From: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Functions 'is_publishable_class' and 'is_publishable_relation' should stay together.
Date: 2022-07-29 04:38:59
Message-ID: CAHut+Pt7iM1ON2nvj+W5tgWB=57GtozXv__6f82K_iyjFf=Mmg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

PSA v2 of this patch, modified as suggested.

------
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia

Attachment Content-Type Size
v2-0001-Functions-is_publishable_class-and-is_publishable.patch application/octet-stream 1.9 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2022-07-29 04:55:17 Re: generic plans and "initial" pruning
Previous Message Amit Langote 2022-07-29 04:20:37 Re: generic plans and "initial" pruning